"We find that whole communities suddenly fix their minds upon one
object, and go mad in its pursuit; that millions of people become
simultaneously impressed with one new delusion, and run after it, till
their attention is caught by some new folly more captivating than the
first. …Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be
seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses
slowly, and one by one." - Charles Mackay, Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds, 1852 _____________________________
.....
Thought is difficult and painful. The difficulties and pain are due to
confusion. From time to time, with enormous intellectual effect, someone
creates a little order - a small spot of light in the dark sea of
confusion. At first we are all dazzled by the light because we are used
to living in the darkness. But when we regain our senses and examine the
light we find it comes from a farthing candle - the candle of common
sense. To change the metaphor, the sages chase their own tails through
the ages. A little child says 'Gentlemen, you are chasing your own
tails.' The sages gradually lose their angular momentum, and, glancing
over their shoulders, see what they are pursuing. But most of them cannot believe what they see, and the tail chasing does not die out until a generation has passed..... - S.y.n.g.e _____________________________
“Why
is it that experts can sometimes be so entirely wrong, and yet so
emphatic in their convictions? My own belief is that some of the reason
lies in the success of "principles of impotence," particularly in modern
physics. Somehow it seems part of the scientific approach to postulate
impotence.”
- R V Jones, The Scientific Intelligencer _____________________________
We are not hopelessly isolated in time and space on a tiny rock, orbiting an insignificant star in an insignificant galaxy. We are hopefully connected with the power and intelligence of the universe. - [link to www.holoscience.com]
_____________________________
“The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be
sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane.” - Nikola Tesla
“We build but to tear down. Most of our work and resource is
squandered. Our onward march is marked by devastation. Everywhere there
is an appalling loss of time, effort and life. A cheerless view, but
true.” - Nikola Tesla
Synergistic twining has begun to occur properly between us and all that
is not us, sharing fully in reconciliation, easing the complexity of the
twining, making it a more pure relationship. These two causes, us and all that is not us,
within this pure relationship should have the effect of vastly
increasing, influencing and (finally) properly 'evolving' the
relationship with true universal reality.
This results in
incorporating the incoming archetypes with less separation between our
collective consciousness and our overall environment being absorbed and
radiated out from our personal consciousness to earth's magnetosphere to
the sun's environment (heliosphere), our galaxy, local cluster, etc.
all entwining at a much more intimate level of relationship.
As
this synergy continues throughout, the veil will lessen. As the veil
thins on our inside, so our perceptions shift on the outside to reflect
the thinning veil we are perceiving on the inside. The perceptual shift
occurring on the outside will come back into proper alignment, thus
heralding the coming of a new age of enlightenment.
The depths of one persons soul is infinite and boundless. And that is
just one small fractal in this massive eternal picture. Imagine changing
one persons soul, and how it will reflect throughout the entirety of
future self. Imagine over 7 billion boundless souls changing, at the
same moment, into the same direction, the same massive revelations.
Imagine how that would radiate across all 7 billions souls future paths
and all directions, in all times, in all places. Not to mention our
friendlies, and our antagonists.
There is so much more than
merely this material existence. Material existence is literally a mere
shadow to what reality is. It will be beautiful when it all aligns, and
converges.
Concepts are the initial thought forms...we build up certain concepts
and begin putting them into relation to our lives. Some we throw out,
and some we continue buidling upon, thinking and working out in our
heads (and computers nowadays) how we can manifest the concepts into our
reality...then, we actually begin manifesting our thoughts turned to
concepts as we work out how and if they will be beneficial to our
physical lives. We begin building the concepts into our physical reality
and the constructs are born.
We don't have to literally build
the concepts into constructs like a building, but, like religions and
philosophies and 'law systems', we build them through communication.
When they reach a particular tipping threshold, the collective begins
reacting these communicated concepts as if they are a reality, and the
communicated concepts become constructs in our lives...we build entire
governments and civilizations around the constructs.
Science,
religion, philosophies, education, etc are the major constructs...they
are the paradigms...or a collective cohesion and working order of
multiple constructs.
That is why paradigm change is so difficult.
We are embedded in all this...everywhere. And in order to break down a
paradigm, many multiples of constructs must constantly be broken down.
In order for that to happen, other thoughts must take root, forming the
concepts...and with enough influence behind them, they form cracks in
the existing paradigms. But, as you can see, it is a monumental task, as
others who do not want paradigm transformation are repairing the damage
to the existing paradigms with all their might.
So, you get
revolutions of sorts, where the influence is great and strong, punching
cracks in the existing paradigms, quick, hard and constant...persistent.
Then the collapse happens, and the world shifts...
How it manifests and 'sticks' together. It is how the atom is an atom. It is why electricity, magnetism and motion are the foundation of all. It is why elements form in the way they do. Why planets are spherical. Why the sun is spherical. What the space between is made of. How consciousness resides within. What the separation of non-material and material IS. The bridge of spirit into material. Why we need to still ourselves to know god. How we can touch our own souls by going within, rather than without. It is the bridge. It is life and spirit and god and everything between.
But, you must look through this as well, to find the answers. It is right there, we have just pulled away from it, so far away, that we do not understand how IT can be all around us, inside of us, through us.
It results in how Gotama found a way beyond suffering. Jesus wept and said we know not what we do. Why Pythagoras studied all the secrets of the western world. What Plato saw in his Forms. Why the Greeks created their mythology. It is the pattern of all.
...
Electricity and magnetism cannot exist without the other.
If you
were to imagine just one aether unit (you can think of it as one unit or
cloud of electricity/magnetism/movement), all you would really see is a
spherical area of vibration.
Before that 'vibration' came along,
the E/M would be static, or dormant. It would show no properties of
even existing. Once the vibration (movement) comes along electricity
has a moving charge. That moving charge creates a magnetic field. The
magnetic field controls the movement of the little tiny spark of charge.
The magnetic field shapes the path that the charge is going to take.
The charge and magnetic field move relative to each other. Though they
are two different 'forces' they cannot exist without each other.
The
magnetism directs the charge to move in a spiral. There is a reason
for this. The charge/field needs to invert and spin back into itself
(the inner area of the torus) and revert back into the surrounding field
(the spherical shell of the torus). This form allows it to become
self-perpetuating, therefor stable, and can be built upon.
So,
now we have the torus function/structure. It is merely an inverting
magnetic field being energized by electricity caused from 'vibration'.
Put this in motion. Including making sure to laterally spinning and inverting the nested toruses.
This
helps see a little more of the dimensionality of it. But, we are
speaking of 3 spheres, and the above pic is representing only 1.
So,
take one of these and imagine two others interacting with it, at the
same time, all of them laterally spinning towards the center, and on the
other side spinning outwards from the center, the center being where
the z-pinch is occurring.
This is close, though again it
is only showing one sphere. This is called a Tesseract with Sphere and
is not showing any z-pinch. We need the Tesseract form in this model so it can be infinite, which is explained a little later.
We can now begin complexifying the torus by adding more toruses. These toruses are scalable as
they just exist as a magnetic field of spiraling/inverting/reverting
energy. Since they are scalable, they can exist inside another, or
another can exist inside it. But, in order for this 'nesting' to occur,
it needs a structure that can be infinite. So, when a torus comes upon
another torus, they 'fall' into each other. (In reality, all this
takes place simultaneously).
When three toruses are nested and
manifested into a stable form, synergistic lines of interaction are
created (in the form of the tesseract which is what is needed as the
tesseract can be infinite). These lines give rise to hard line shapes
instead of just spherical geometry and begin to form the first Platonic
Solid structures.
We have an infinite structure that is like a
gyrating mixer of different spin states, consisting of 3 toruses that
are 'pinched' together at the very center. This 'pinch' occurs from the
direction of the magnetic field as it inverts on itself. Take a
perfectly round balloon and squeeze it in the middle. When you do this
it creates two cones, one on either side of where you are squeezing
(pinching) it.
Now, imagine the balloon is the initial torus
with laterally spinning energy. As you are holding this pinched
balloon, it is spinning, say, clockwise. On one side of the balloon,
the clockwise spin heads toward the center. Continue the spin, through
the center, and now it is heading out from the center.
Immediately
below is just the tesseract. If you notice, it is a cube within a
cube, both connected through the the 'lines' that make up the cube form.
Imagine this going infinitely both ways; smaller and smaller cubes
inside each one, instead of just one inside one, and larger and larger
cubes containing all the ones smaller.
There
would be three spheres, all formed within the cube form. We have 6
sides, but only 3 spheres. One side of sphere spinning inwards toward
the center on on of the 'sides' and on it's opposite side, spinning
outwards. Here is the form, but imagine it as a sphere instead of just
the two cones of spiraling motion.
Now,
put three of these pinched balloons together. You are going to have 6
spinning 'sides', 3 of them spinning in, and 3 spinning out from center.
One
spiraling 'side' of a sphere would interact with its adjacent spiraling
sphere much like gears, where one is spinning in counterclockwise and
the adjacent one is spinning out clockwise, the entire structure forming
a single gyrating sphere like manifestation. That is the single sphere
that you are seeing on the inside of the picture I supplied. Except,
that single sphere is the interstice point of all the three spinning
spheres. If you zoomed in on that spherical interstice point, it would
look just like the one you zoomed in from...three spheres spinning in
and out.
Jumping back to the box. Each of its 6 sides is
actually one side of opposing spinning sphere and the lines that make it
look 'cube-like' are the synergistic lines of interacting spins.
There
are 8 points within the cube, with the 9th point being the convergence
of all opposed spins lying at the very center of the cube (the next
lower manifestation of this infinite construct). This 9th point is also
the whole of this construct, as it is a fractal resonation throughout,
similar to the initial picture of toruses nested within toruses. It is
the image above of the Terreract Cube going infinitely in both
'directions' with the spinning spheres included.
The lines you
see in Tesseract pic would be the interaction lines, not really there,
except for the adjacent spheres spinning like gears, some lines going
in, some lines going out.
To see this in reality, look at Saturn's Hexagon, and you can see how straight lines of geometry are creating through spheres interacting with SPIN.
Relationship is the foundation of reality. Synergy is the relationship in the interacting relationship with each other.
If
you flattened it out, it would appear to be a cross. 4 boxes going
vertical, and two boxes going out horizontal from the second box down of
the vertical boxes.
Within each box of the cube (side) is one side of an inward or outward laterally spinning torus.
Then,
we begin complexifying it by joining all others into the mix, and we
begin to see the flower of life form. What is missing, is the
'cube-like' are the synergistic lines of interacting spins, though you
can see some geometric shapes in the picture below, even though it is
all created from spherical geometry.
That is the 'vision' of the
form. It would look like one sphere, but strangely it has 6 spinning
areas, and where the spins are hitting adjacent spins, there is some
kind of 'line' being created from the interaction.
We've got a
gyrating sphere of energy and magnetism, stable and self-perpetuating,
created out of aether (dormant E/M), created out of ITSELF! but put in
motion to manifest into visible material reality.
Take this
gyrating sphere and add other sphere's the same size. If they were
smaller, perhaps they would nest into the interior of the 'pinch' area.
If you zoomed into the pinched area, you would see the same exact
structure/form as the initial. The initial is nested inside a larger
one, etc. Back to the same size spheres. How many spheres can you put
in closest relation to our single original gyrating sphere? 3, for a
total of 4 spheres. Stability again! If you put just one next to it,
you can see the sphere's just spinning around each other willy-nilly.
Same with 2 spheres. But with a total of 4 spheres, the spheres don't
move around each other all willy-nilly! There is organization...there
is stability. There is a tetrahedron. Our first Platonic Solid.
This is what I call: complexification.
In
order to replicate the stability and organization apparent in the 4
spheres, how many more spheres would we need? 8. This further step up
in complexity is our cube.
This is how vibrating string theories create 'spheres' that invert back on themselves through energy/magnetism/motion.
By
looking in two dimensions, we only see a vibrating looped string. When
looking in 3 dimensions, we see that it is actually creating a
vibrating sphere, and we now have up/down, left/right which creates our 3
'dimensional' material universe.
Once we begin seeing 4
dimensions, we see that the spheres are actually vibrating in a way that
makes them invert back into itself, and a torus is seen. By vibrating
back into itself, it becomes a perpetual motion system. Now, we have
added a 'layer' to understanding reality. We have up/down, left/right,
and in/out.
These three toruses, when synced up, actually look like a single sphere,
with 6 spinning sides, spiraling either inwards, or outwards, all
contained within the magnetic field it creates, which is spherical in
shape.
This overall single sphere is the first 'stable' form that
arises out of the aether (The Higgs Field). As stated above, when four of these
spheres (3,6,9 spheres) align, the first Platonic Solid form is created.
The tetrahedron.
Here is a single laterally spinning torus.
The molecule
In the version I
presented, there are three together. So, instead of having one
inversion line as seen in this video, there would be three inversion
'lines' all intersecting in the center, which would form another smaller
grouping of three spheres (appearing in 3 dimensions like a single
sphere).
It seems that a group of scientist DID use the idea of sonoluminescence to create fusion. It is called Acoustic Inertial Confinement Fusion. When they successfully produced results in France at NURETH-11 for peer review, they shortly afterward got hammered by the 'institutions'.
DARPA's involved, UCLA, Oak Ridge National Lab, Purdue University, and a few science journals.
Initially one of the scientists did experiments of Sonofusion at Oak Ridge National Labs, but they couldn't get a good enough ratio of repeatable results. I think the story goes like this...so, they went to Purdue University. They used a variation in techniques and became successful. This is when they decided to go to NURETH-11. A lawsuit was brought into the mix, and all funding got cut off and they got caught up in legal issues, which resulted in the main scientist getting debarred and discredited (no funding, etc.), though affidavits out the butt proved otherwise.
See below for the articles etc.,
Read this letter.
Lahey Letter to Physics Today Feb. 20, 2009 Response from Marty Hanna is below Lahey letter
You write, “Independent research groups have so far failed to confirm the result of Taleyarkhan’s group.” Indeed, this is at the heart of much of the controversy concerning bubble fusion. However, this is false. Edward Forringer, William Bugg, Adam Butt, and Yiban Xu have performed and reported independent confirmations of bubble fusion. This is in addition to on-demand public demonstration of successful outcomes of bubble fusion on two occasions. [link to newenergytimes.com]
Now, who is Lahey? Google DARPA Lahey.
Holy crap. I think I found a cover-up. This is crazy...
Umm, check this out. This Lahey guy says they successfully did it! Lahey Affidavit To the best of my recollection, I received from Taleyarkhan summary documentation of successful sonofusion results in June, 2005. How in the world could someone surmise that DARPA-UCLA funds, which arrived into the Purdue financial system in June, 2005, actually contribute to the intense underlying research to find a way to self-nucleate in a totally different fluid-mixture of vastly different properties, in a differently designed test cell, with random vs timed nucleation, conduct a large array oftests, including careful control experiments, within "seconds" of receiving funding from a new source? The mere thought of suggesting the use of such funds for something already largely accomplished (and only requiring publication) is totally bizarre. [link to newenergytimes.com]
cont.
39. The above mentioned issues highlighted in the Press are a either wrongful or inaccurate allegations against Taleyarkhan (and in many respects all of us who worked with him) and have no merit. These are apparently desperate attempts by our competitors to detract from our seminal work on the discovery of sonofusion. [link to newenergytimes.com]
Purdue News ____
March 2, 2004 Evidence bubbles over to support tabletop nuclear fusion device WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind. – Researchers are reporting new evidence supporting their earlier discovery of an inexpensive "tabletop" device that uses sound waves to produce nuclear fusion reactions. Rusi Taleyarkhan
The researchers believe the new evidence shows that "sonofusion" generates nuclear reactions by creating tiny bubbles that implode with tremendous force. Nuclear fusion reactors have historically required large, multibillion-dollar machines, but sonofusion devices might be built for a fraction of that cost. [link to www.purdue.edu]
Bubblegate Testimonials and Affidavits
Back to Bubblegate Portal
Before Lefteri Tsoukalas was removed as the head of the Purdue School of Nuclear Engineering, an extra-legal committee that he organized produced the Feb. 23, 2006, Statement from Adam Butt. Someone provided this document to Kenneth Chang of The New York Times. Chang has declined to confirm or deny whether Tsoukalas provided the document. Chang has confirmed that he received other related documents from Tsoukalas. Chang made the decision to publish the unsigned, unnotarized, unsworn, unverified document.
The Statement from Adam Butt caused severe problems for Rusi Taleyarkhan, a professor in the School of Nuclear Engineering. In response, numerous people came to Taleyarkhan's defense with testimonials and affidavits. A number of the affidavits accuse Tsoukalas of serious grievances. Some of them are now part of the public record in legal proceedings. [link to newenergytimes.com]
On March 1, 2006 I helped set up two experiment stations for review by the visitors. The first and main station involved experiments needed for the DARPA-UCLA project (i.e., using external neutrons). The second experiment involved self-nucleation for which Ken Suslick of University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign himself was invited to and did indeed randomly select neutron detectors for mounting on the test cells and for use as controls. He also insisted on doing the experiment in a particular way and we accommodated each of his requests during setup. At the end of the day, the detectors showed positive signatures of neutron emission as evidenced by several people in the audience. Neither I, nor anyone from Purdue engaged in misconduct of any kind and in fact went out ofour way to assist the visitors engage in a successful review. [link to newenergytimes.com]
They did it, didn't they? I mean, they did, but then funding got cut-off and they tried to discredit the researchers. Bubblegate.
They said it in signed affidavits. They did it, and were successful.
Recent Advances and Results in Acoustic Inertial Confinement Bubble Nuclear Fusion R. P. Taleyarkhan
Abstract
This paper provides an update on developments since the first announcement of the discovery in 2002 of acoustic inertial confinement (a.k.a bubble) nuclear fusion. A theoretical foundation for the supercompression of acoustically driven deuterated bubble clusters has been developed and published. Initially, bubble fusion experiments used external neutron sources for nucleating bubble clusters, and despite compelling evidence, lingering doubts remained because of the use of external neutrons to maintain neutron production. This was overcome using a self-nucleation method. In those novel experiments, seeding of nanometer bubbles was accomplished using nuclear-decay recoils from dissolved uranyl nitrate. Bubble fusion experiments have been replicated successfully, and confirmatory results were reported at least five times since 2005. Moreover, speculations and controversies about the discovery related to our bubble fusion experiments have now been conclusively addressed, rebutted, and dismissed. [link to pubs.acs.org]
___________________________________________ A standing wave of sound creates a bubble in liquid. When the bubble implodes, light is emitted. This is called: Sonoluminescence. Awesome.
Sonoluminescence is the emission of short bursts of light from imploding bubbles in a liquid when excited by sound.
In 1989 a major experimental advance was introduced by Felipe Gaitan and Lawrence Crum, who produced stable single-bubble sonoluminescence (SBSL). In SBSL, a single bubble trapped in an acoustic standing wave, emits a pulse of light with each compression of the bubble within the standing wave. This technique allowed a more systematic study of the phenomenon, because it isolated the complex effects into one stable, predictable bubble. It was realized that the temperature inside the bubble was hot enough to melt steel. Interest in sonoluminescence was renewed when an inner temperature of such a bubble well above one million kelvins was postulated. This temperature is thus far not conclusively proven, though recent experiments conducted by the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign indicate temperatures around 20,000 K.
Sonoluminescence can occur when a sound wave of sufficient intensity induces a gaseous cavity within a liquid to collapse quickly. This cavity may take the form of a pre-existing bubble, or may be generated through a process known as cavitation. Sonoluminescence in the laboratory can be made to be stable, so that a single bubble will expand and collapse over and over again in a periodic fashion, emitting a burst of light each time it collapses. For this to occur, a standing acoustic wave is set up within a liquid, and the bubble will sit at a pressure anti-node of the standing wave. The frequencies of resonance depend on the shape and size of the container in which the bubble is contained.
~ The light flashes from the bubbles are extremely short—between 35 and a few hundred picoseconds long—with peak intensities of the order of 1–10 mW.
~ The bubbles are very small when they emit the light—about 1 micrometre in diameter—depending on the ambient fluid (e.g., water) and the gas content of the bubble (e.g., atmospheric air).
~ Single-bubble sonoluminescence pulses can have very stable periods and positions. In fact, the frequency of light flashes can be more stable than the rated frequency stability of the oscillator making the sound waves driving them. However, the stability analyses of the bubble show that the bubble itself undergoes significant geometric instabilities, due to, for example, the Bjerknes forces and Rayleigh–Taylor instabilities.
~ The addition of a small amount of noble gas (such as helium, argon, or xenon) to the gas in the bubble increases the intensity of the emitted light. [link to en.wikipedia.org]
I was asked to play in my lucid dream sandbox about this.
So, I played last night in my sand box. I am getting ready for work, so I can't write it out now, but I saw why this statement must be true. This is from the paper quoted.
[link to arxiv.org] "An answer to “why no magnetic monopoles?” is now clear. So long as there were thought to exist the electrical monopoles known as charges, a deep belief in symmetry demanded that we consider and look for magnetic monopoles. This study concludes that there are no electrical monopoles. To this extent, symmetry has been recovered."
My study (hehe) also concluded there cannot be any monopoles. Monopoles instability actually LEADS TO dipoles. They either collapse, or form dipoles. (I need to explain why...but later) Funny, I am looking at the stuff they cannot see. It has to do with contained spin forms that are spiral. What creates the spin forms? Light. Light is the only TRUE constant, therefor there are no fluctuations in the speed of the spin. The only way for dipoles to remain absolutely stable like they do, is with an absolute constant defining it.
More later.
Also, I played for about 2 hours with Klein Bubbles. Awesome. You know what I requested to 'see'? That's right. Black holes. BTW, they come in all sorts of shapes, not merely spherical. I imagine the ones nested at the center of the galaxies must be mainly spherical...but, they are absolutely incredible things! I even experimented with a supernova entering a black hole. WHOA! The result the volume was annihilated, but the skin still existed, although very shriveled up and emaciated. For relation, the size of the volume would be a house, and the skin would be a quarter after the interaction and implode/explode of the two.
Also, I experimented with injecting a massive object into the Klein Bubbles, and it resulted in a Klein Bottle effect. [link to en.wikipedia.org]
"Since matter is created from photons, and photons are entirely electromagnetic, it follows that matter is indeed made up of EM fields. They are arranged differently, in light and in particles.
I have found a way to arrange the EM fields to achieve the particle properties of charge, mass, angular momentum, spin, and stability. The paper is posted on arxiv under physics/0611266. The electron can be modeled as a dipolar B field that morphs into a toroidal E field, and back, at the Compton frequency. The electric and magnetic fluxes are quantized. Precession of this spinning model about a different axis then creates "charge". Mass is the encapsulated kinetic energy of these changing and spinning EM fields. Charge is created by a vxB mechanism of the spinning dipolar B field." [link to lofi.forum.physorg.com]
BTW, I wish I could express these visions more accurately, but it is extremely difficult in words.
Once again, the shapes are very similar to what Walter Russell was trying to express. In this video, you see two spiral forms mirroring each other. My vision was a little different, and more complex than this, but it will help visualization.
Instead of starting with two spins, start with one. And it is spinning FAST! The one begins extending, and as it extends its Spiraling Conical Filament, it actually creates the field it is formed in (torus shape). At the far end of the 'invisible' torus field, the extending SCF begins 'bunching' up and 'mirroring' the original spinning vortex. As the mirroring spinning vortex grows (it will eventually be the same size as the original), the two begin attracting together, and getting closer. As they get close, the amplitude is rising inside the two spiraling vortices, which creates an increase in repulsion. Then, they both stop attracting and stabilize at a particular distance apart. When I look close at the interaction, I notice there are streaks of multicolored light being emitted from between the two phased locked vortices.
When I was doing the experiment, I couldn't figure out what the slow colored lights were being emitted. It wasn't until later today that I reread my posts, and realized what it had to be...CHARGE!
"Precession of this spinning model about a different axis then creates "charge". Mass is the encapsulated kinetic energy of these changing and spinning EM fields. Charge is created by a vxB mechanism of the spinning dipolar B field."
"Since matter is created from photons, and photons are entirely electromagnetic, it follows that matter is indeed made up of EM fields. They are arranged differently, in light and in particles.
I have found a way to arrange the EM fields to achieve the particle properties of charge, mass, angular momentum, spin, and stability. The paper is posted on arxiv under physics/0611266. The electron can be modeled as a dipolar B field that morphs into a toroidal E field, and back, at the Compton frequency. The electric and magnetic fluxes are quantized. Precession of this spinning model about a different axis then creates "charge". Mass is the encapsulated kinetic energy of these changing and spinning EM fields. Charge is created by a vxB mechanism of the spinning dipolar B field." [link to lofi.forum.physorg.com]
how you attempt to steer a complex system is not the prime issue steer with love steer with fear steer with anything the prime issue is your motive to steer if the purpose (goal) does not synchronize with the complex systems innate motive, thus by default all other complex systems interactive you are fucked the complex system self rectifies , forced to by the momentum of the other systems effects upon it
Quoting: aether
I see your words as pulses, wave forms...interesting. That is the immediate 'image' I get.
The motive is intention, sending out your own personal pulses into the system. The system has infinitely more pulses reacting, and if yours is in dissonance to the complex system, the complex system's pulses will soon nullify through interference patterns, all of the individual's pulses. If it resonates, the pulses harmonize and the intention grows greater into the system through 'mergence'.
What would be incredible, is a form of varied intention from an isolated source, that is somehow harmonic with the complex system. One isolated source, putting out motive from all these different angles...philosophy, spiritual, communal, etc...all harmonic to the system, resonating through the complex system, changing it to new patterns of pulses...shortly afterward becoming self perpetuating and reactive. Quoting: Chad
NASA ...lightning discharge in a thundercloud can temporarily change the electric field above the cloud where charged ice crystals were reflecting sunlight. The new electric field quickly re-orients the geometric crystals to a new orientation that reflects sunlight differently. In other words, a lightning discharge can cause a sundog to jump.
Astronomers have found the brightest and youngest example yet of a fast-spinning star, suggesting that the extremely luminous versions of these super-dense objects may be far more common than thought...
..The pulsar's extreme brightness and youth challenge current ideas about how super-bright millisecond pulsars form and how widespread they may be, researchers said...
...When a mass as great as our sun's is packed into a space the size of a city, the conserved angular momentum causes the resulting neutron star to spin very rapidly and to emit a ray of high-energy light that sweeps around like a lighthouse beam.
This light appears to pulse because astronomers see the beam only when it's pointed at Earth. "Normal" pulsars rotate at a rate between 7 and 3,750 revolutions per minute, but millisecond pulsars can spin much faster — up to 43,000 rotations per minute...
J1823-3021A also appears to have a much stronger magnetic field than other millisecond pulsars. The exotic object's combination of characteristics is likely to have astronomers scratching their heads, Freire said.
..."It challenges the way we believe millisecond pulsars form," he said. "It was not thought that, for the spin period of this object (5.44 ms), they could be so energetic and have such a high magnetic field."...
...The researchers aren't yet sure whether millisecond pulsar formation theories will need a tweak or a serious overhaul.
"We are currently investigating a number of possibilities," study co-author Michael Kramer, director of the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy, said in a statement. "Nature might even be forming millisecond pulsars in a way we have not anticipated." http://www.space.com/13488-brightest-spinning-pulsars-nasa-fermi-telescope.html
.bmp)
.bmp)
